James Murdoch is the only member of the world’s most powerful media family who dared to suggest that the empire had a soul worth saving—or perhaps, a soul that needed to be saved.

In Bonfire of the Murdochs (Simon & Schuster), author Gabriel Sherman chronicles the tragic arc of the younger son, a hip-hop loving ‘rebel’ who was seduced back into the fold with the promise of modernizing a company built on tabloid savagery.

Unlike his brother Lachlan, who inherited the power, or his sister Liz, who built her own fortune, James inherited the burden of his father’s sins, becoming the sacrificial lamb of the phone-hacking scandal before transforming into the family’s moral conscience.

This piece explores how the ‘smartest’ Murdoch tried to turn a right-wing propaganda machine into a respectable corporation, only to be crushed by the realization that in Rupert Murdoch’s world, ethics are always bad for business.

——————————————————————————–

The son who wanted to be good

On the morning of September 17, 2024, James Murdoch walked into a sterile courtroom in Reno, Nevada, wearing a dark suit and a grim expression. At 51, he looked like a corporate executive, but his history was far more complex. He was there to testify against his father, Rupert Murdoch, in a secret trial that would determine the fate of the world’s most powerful media empire. It was the climax of a “blood feud” that had torn the family apart. James, once the heir apparent, was now the leader of the “Objecting Children,” fighting to stop his father and brother Lachlan from turning Fox News into a permanent weapon of the far-right.

To understand James Murdoch is to understand a tragedy of ambition and morality. He is the “Rebel” who dropped out of Harvard to start a hip-hop label, only to be seduced back into the family business with the promise of modernizing it. He is the “Reformer” who tried to make News Corp a respectable, carbon-neutral, digital powerhouse, only to be destroyed by the very tabloid culture he tried to tame. And finally, he is the “Outcast,” the son who ultimately chose his conscience over his crown, exiting the empire with $2 billion and a burning desire to destroy the monster he helped feed.

James is defined by a central conflict: the struggle to reconcile his desire for his father’s love with his revulsion for his father’s values. Unlike Lachlan, who mirrored Rupert, or Elisabeth, who sought independence, James sought redemption for the family name. He wanted to prove that a Murdoch could be a force for good. He failed. And in his failure, he became the most fascinating, tragic, and ultimately consequential figure in the dynasty’s collapse.

——————————————————————————–

Origins: The intellectual rebel

The counter-culture prince : Born in 1972, James was the youngest of the 3 children from Rupert’s marriage to Anna. While Lachlan was the “golden child” and Elisabeth the “sharp” striver, James was the mercurial intellect. He was the “moody kid with bleached hair, tattoos, and piercings” who loved archeology and seemingly wanted nothing to do with the family business.

His rebellion was not just aesthetic; it was substantive. He enrolled at Harvard in 1991 to study history and film but spent his time drawing comics for the satirical Lampoon. In a gesture designed to horrify his conservative father, he dropped out of Harvard in 1995 to launch Rawkus Records, a hip-hop label that produced groundbreaking acts like Mos Def and Talib Kweli.

• The contrast: While Rupert was dining with Margaret Thatcher, James was navigating the underground rap scene. News of the World editor Piers Morgan recalled James boasting that he packed heat at work: “I keep a gun under my desk because some of these rap guys come in to negotiate their contracts with Uzi machine guns… Don’t tell dad—he’d go mad!”.

The seduction : Despite his rebellion, James possessed a “gravitational pull” toward the empire. Rupert, recognizing James’s intellect and need for approval, lured him back in 1996. He bought Rawkus Records, then installed James as the head of News Corp’s Australian music division.

• The Pattern: This established the primary pattern of James’s life: Co-option. He tries to build something independent (Rawkus, and later his own investment firm Lupa Systems), but Rupert eventually buys it or him, bringing him back into the fold. James calls himself a rebel, but he is addicted to the scale and power that only his father can provide.

——————————————————————————–

The businessman: The technocrat and the modernizer

James Murdoch is widely considered the most operationally gifted of the siblings. While Lachlan is a “big picture” ideologue who relies on loyalty, James is a detail-oriented technocrat who speaks the language of Silicon Valley.

The Star TV turnaround (2000-2003) James’s first major test was Star TV in Hong Kong. It was a “poisoned chalice”—a money-losing satellite service in a region hostile to Western media.

• The strategy: James adopted a ruthless pragmatism. He criticized the BBC and cravenly courted the Chinese Communist Party, attacking the Falun Gong to please Beijing. It was a shocking betrayal of Western democratic values, but it worked. By 2002, Star TV turned its first profit. James had “juiced” the revenues and proved he could be just as ruthless as Rupert.

The King of Sky (2003-2007) Rupert rewarded James by making him CEO of BSkyB (Sky) in London at age 30. The appointment was slammed as nepotism (“The Borgias,” one shareholder sneered), but James silenced the critics.

• What he is good at: James is a master of scale and future-proofing. He pushed Sky into broadband and high-definition TV years before competitors. He grew the subscriber base to 10 million and transformed Sky into a respected, innovative tech company. Under James, Sky was not just a Murdoch mouthpiece; it was a “blue-chip” corporation.

• The dream: This was the version of the company James wanted to lead: modern, digital, and respectable. He wanted to be the “anti-Rupert”—a Murdoch who was invited to Davos not out of fear, but out of respect.

The “Shadow Government” : By 2009, James was running News Corp’s operations in Europe and Asia. He set up a “parallel power structure” or “Shadow Government” in New York, staffing it with liberals and environmentalists. He convinced Rupert to make News Corp “carbon neutral,” a massive achievement that allowed James to look his liberal wife, Kathryn, in the eye.

• The pivot: When traditional tabloid tactics (like the ones used at The Sun) threatened his vision, James tried to pivot the company toward “compliance” and “governance.” He hated the “pirate” culture of his father’s old guard.

——————————————————————————–

The tragedy: The phone hacking scandal

James’s downfall is a study in hubris and willful blindness. He wanted the power of the empire but didn’t want to know how the sausage was made.

The crisis (2011) In July 2011, The Guardian revealed that News of the World—a paper under James’s purview—had hacked the voicemail of Milly Dowler, a murdered teenager. The revelation sparked a firestorm that threatened to destroy the entire company.

• James’s failure: James had approved settlements for hacking victims years earlier but claimed he didn’t know the extent of the criminality. He was “muzzled” by legal advice and appeared “robotic and testy” before Parliament. He failed to grasp the emotional reality of the scandal, treating it as a PR problem rather than a moral catastrophe.

The betrayal : This moment defined his relationship with Rupert. James expected his father to fire Rebekah Brooks, the editor who oversaw the hacking, and clean house. Instead, Rupert protected Brooks (whom he viewed as a “5th daughter”) and let James take the fall.

• The scapegoat: James was forced to resign from Sky and move to New York, his reputation in tatters. He realized then that to Rupert, loyalty to the “pirates” (Brooks, Ailes) was more important than competence or blood. James was the “sacrificial lamb”.

——————————————————————————–

The “reformer”: Fighting for the soul of the company

Exiled to New York, James underwent a transformation. His resentment “matured into a moral awakening”. He and his wife Kathryn became convinced that Fox News and the family’s right-wing politics were a “threat to democracy.”

The Ailes takedown (2016) James’s greatest victory as a corporate infighter was the removal of Roger Ailes. When Gretchen Carlson sued Ailes for sexual harassment in 2016, James saw an opportunity for redemption.

• The alliance: He formed a temporary alliance with Lachlan. While Lachlan wanted Ailes out for business reasons (Ailes was insubordinate), James wanted him out for moral reasons. James hired the law firm Paul, Weiss to conduct a real investigation, bypassing the company’s internal protections.

• The execution: James argued they had to “cut the cancer out.” When they fired Ailes, James wanted to purge the entire culture of toxicity. But Rupert and Lachlan stopped him. They fired the man but kept the machine (Fox News) running exactly as before. This was the moment James realized he could never truly fix the company.

The Disney sale (2017) James was the primary architect of the sale of 21st Century Fox to Disney for $71.3 billion.

• What he really wanted: James pitched the deal as a necessary business move (News Corp was too small to compete with Netflix). But privately, he wanted to “break free.” He wanted to dismantle the empire so that Lachlan couldn’t inherit it. He saw the sale as an “escape hatch” for himself and a way to turn his siblings into billionaires who wouldn’t need Rupert’s approval.

——————————————————————————–

The social and cultural personality: The “Good” Murdoch

James vs. The Family : James is the only Murdoch who desperately craves acceptance from the “elites” his father despises.

• Cultural values: He quotes poetry by Pablo Neruda, reads Salman Rushdie, and is friends with the “Google guys” (Larry Page, Sergey Brin). He and Kathryn are climate activists who donate to the Anti-Defamation League and Democratic candidates.

• The conflict: This creates a painful cognitive dissonance. James wants to be a “Davos Man”—progressive, environmentalist, globalist. But his wealth comes from a company that promotes climate denialism and nativism.

• The “wife” factor: His wife, Kathryn Hufschmid, is crucial to understanding him. A model and marketing executive with strong liberal views, she acts as James’s moral compass (or, in Rupert’s view, the “Lady Macbeth” pulling him to the left). Kathryn openly challenged Rupert on Fox’s coverage of climate change and Nazis, creating immense friction at family gatherings.

The “objecting child” : In the final years, James became the voice of dissent.

• Charlottesville (2017): After Trump said there were “very fine people on both sides” of a neo-Nazi rally, James wrote a leaked email pledging $1 million to the ADL. “I can’t even believe I have to write this: standing up to Nazis is essential,” he wrote. It was a direct rebuke of Fox News’s apologia for Trump.

• The resignation (2020): In July 2020, James resigned from the board of News Corp, citing “disagreements over certain editorial content.” It was the ultimate “mic drop.” He walked away from the succession, choosing his principles over his patrimony.

——————————————————————————–

The patterns of James Murdoch

1. The pattern of intellectual arrogance James often believes he is the smartest person in the room. He uses “MBA buzzwords” and corporate speak that alienates the “ink-stained wretches” of the tabloids.

• Example: In 2009, he gave the MacTaggart Lecture, aggressively attacking the BBC and British media regulations. He thought he was being a visionary; the British public saw him as an arrogant corporate raider. This lack of emotional intelligence made him an easy target during the hacking scandal.

2. The pattern of “saving” the company James consistently tries to “save” the company from its own worst instincts. He tried to save it from irrelevance by pushing into digital (Sky). He tried to save it from scandal by firing Ailes. He tried to save it from climate denialism.

• The failure: Every time he tried to reform the company, he was thwarted by the profits the “bad behavior” generated. He could never convince Rupert that “good ethics” was “good business” because, in the Murdoch universe, outrage was the business model.

3. The pivot: From fixer to destroyer When James realizes a strategy isn’t working, he doesn’t just pivot; he burns the bridge.

• The pivot: When he realized he couldn’t fix Fox News from the inside (after Ailes left and Tucker Carlson rose), he didn’t stay and fight a losing battle. He engineered the Disney sale to sell off the assets, effectively dismantling the kingdom he was supposed to inherit. If he couldn’t rule it, he would shrink it.

——————————————————————————–

The Endgame: The man who killed the king

The Trust Battle (2023-2024) The final act of James’s life in the family was the secret trial in Reno.

• The motivation: James led the coalition of “Objecting Children” (with Liz and Prue). He fought Rupert’s attempt to change the trust not just for money, but to prevent Lachlan from turning the empire into a permanent force for the far-right.

• The testimony: In court, James was emotional. He broke down crying when talking about his mistreatment by his father. “There have been a lot of hurtful things over the years,” he said. “We worked together very closely for a long time. It’s hard”.

• The outcome: James took the money. In the settlement, he received $1.1 billion (plus his share of the Disney billions) to walk away. He gave up his vote, but he gained his freedom.

What does he dream to become? James dreams of being a builder of something pure. He established Lupa Systems to invest in liberal, sustainable media companies (like Vice and Tribeca Enterprises). He wants to use his billions to fund the antidote to Fox News. He wants to be the Murdoch who is remembered for creating culture, not poisoning it.

Conclusion: The Lost Boy 

James Murdoch is the most complex figure in the saga because he is the only one who truly wrestled with the morality of his inheritance. Lachlan accepted the power; Liz accepted the money; James wanted the soul. He is memorable because he represents the limit of what can be changed from within. He proved that you cannot modernize a machine built on hate; you can only dismantle it or leave it. In the end, James Murdoch is a rich man with a clear conscience, but a broken heart—a son who realized that to be a good man, he had to stop being a Murdoch.

---

Check the other posts in this BOOK NOTES on the Murdochs:

• LALA’S BOOKNOTES: Bonfire of the Murdochs: How the epic fight to control the last great media dynasty broke a family—and the world, by Gabriel Sherman
• RUPERT MURDOCH: The man who wanted everything
• MURDOCH’S 5 WIVES: Managing a portfolio of mergers and liquidations
• LACHLAN MURDOCH: A comprehensive profile of ‘the last prince’
• JAMES MURDOCH: The Redemption of ‘the Rebel Heir’
• ELISABETH ‘LIZ’ MURDOCH: A comprehensive profile of ‘the exiled queen’
• PRUE MURDOCH: A comprehensive profile of ‘the ghost in the room’